How plausible is it that someone can send sound to someone else from a distance with an invisible source?
It's very plausible, and it's called radio, television and a cell phone. If sound can be transmitted via different wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum across large areas such as a satellite dish or cell phone tower, and then on to a smaller receiver such as a TV, cell phone or radio, then sending sound directly to a person's head becomes plausible.
It is a fact that sound can be sent on a beam of light of a certain wavelengths. The wavelengths are invisible and all around us, so who could prove they were being targeted with such technology?
Now here's the tricky part, if sound is transmitted to a human's head where is the receiver? All sound is sent on a frequency to a receiver, as in the TV, radio communications and cell phones which operate on certain known frequencies. So, what frequency is the human brain?
Well, it has been known for almost a century that certain frequencies can stimulate the brain, and now we can all buy some type of technology to alter our moods in the form of various novelties and devices meant to relax or stimulate the brain, as the brain uses frequencies.
Again, this makes it plausible that sound could be sent to a human skull or in close enough proximity to a human skull that it could create sounds or voices that only one person could hear, without any implants to receive the wavelengths, creating symptoms of schizophrenia in sane persons, as sane people don't hear voices (unless they're saints or prophets).
These days if someone actually heard the voice of God and told others, they would probably be telling prophecies from a padded cell. So it is possible that all the people gangstalked who claim to be victims of V2K are telling the truth, not a perceived truth but the honest actual truth, because what they describe may be quite more than plausible. But, that doesn't mean that the victims were bombarded with energy fields, as there are lesser technologies that can do the trick that anyone with enough time and money at hand could acquire and utilize to their advantage.
So, once again I won't scream government conspiracy (just yet). But, I will scream regular conspiracy carried out by stupid people to destroy the lives of others for profit and personal gain.
The U.S. Government has acquired several patents for technology, and neuroscience has several newer treatments that would hint at the very idea of V2K, and I will post links to some of those patents and treatments just as an FYI.
Also, now that I have explored the likely chance of V2K as a plausibility via technology, I will have to post on gwen and haarp technology at some point.
So, in conclusion on V2K I ask the question; why would the government want to test such technologies on the unwitting public? The answer would be necessity, and it wouldn't be the first time unwitting subjects were used in research. However, if it is not the government it is known to the government, who isn't doing anything to stop it, and it must be making someone a fortune. Enough money always seems to close eyes.
It is possible that V2K may be a public test of some type of "Non Lethal Weapon" that must be tested blindly in real life situations to yield accurate data.
It is the belief and level of rational of the individual that will determine the source of the voices heard or injuries sustained as either government, aliens, mental illness, ghosts etc., but it doesn't mean that any of the victims are "crazy", "liars", or "delusional". All gangstalking victims have trouble explaining the unexplainable.
I have not experienced V2K to my knowledge, but what I have experienced is not easy to put into words as a victim of gangstalking. I still have yet to know of anyone else who has had an experience that closely or completely mirrors my own.
Even with all the many victims world wide I am still very much alone.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
V2K: Hearing Voices?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment