The Gaslight Effect: The Master Of Induced Delusion In Gangstalking

Gaslighting has been called a covert form of control, which is 100% true.
In the hoax world of truth and lies that is Gangstalking the silly term Gaslighting has often come up to describe psychological harassment. Important tactics used in Gangstalkings have been called Gaslighting. But what is Gaslighting anyway, and how can someone know it when they see it, or when it happens to them?


You can search the web for the term Gaslighting, and still not find any real information on the topic, because it's a made up term that tried to get legitimized into the English lexicon by pranksters and at least one legitimate psychiatrist, Dr. T.L. Dopart. http://www.lawandreligion.com/sites/lawandreligion.com/files/Dorpat%20with%20Foreword.pdf Why would a psychiatrist pick a term like Gaslighting?


In the June 2007 issue of O magazine (Oprah Winfrey's publication) "The Gaslight Effect" appears as an article that can still be found on Oprah's website, but the article misses much. A search on the Internet won't tell you much either, and will relate Gaslighting to psychological or verbal abuse found in toxic relationships or ambient sound. But how did it get started?


Gaslighting is based on a 1944 movie staring Ingrid Bergman called "Gaslight", that involves a husband attempting to drive his wife crazy so that he could get rid of her to protect a secret. The movie is named "Gaslight" because one of the husband's favorite tactics is to mess with the gas lights in the house to dim the lights while his wife is home, and when the wife asks about the lights the husband denies that anything is happening with the lights dimming as if she is delusional The husband attempts to psychologically harass his wife covertly into a mental break down. More information can be obtained from the IMDB database concerning the film if interested. http://m.imdb.com/title/tt0036855/

What the websites on toxic relationships fail to mention is a book alleged to have been written and published in 1994 called "Gaslighting" about the art of revenge to harass people into madness, so the author claims. The book is real, but the publish date might actually be different. The book "Gaslighting" was named after the movie "Gaslight" which is where the term comes from.


There is also a serious published work by Dr. Theodore Dopart published in 1996 that uses the term Gaslighting in reference to the field of psychology and covert manipulation by therapist during psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. Though the work of Dr. Theodore Dopart probably has little to do with Gangstalking as a whole (?), I felt it important to mention the use of the term "Gaslighting" by a notable forensic psychiatrist and suicidologist.


Now what does an old black and white film and a revenge book have to do with Gangstalking. Well for one, it tells the age and tastes of the masterminds of Gangstalking, as well as their choices in reading materials, interest in old films and sociopathic tendencies. The movie is from 1944, and outside of film majors, people in the industry and old movie buffs, not that many young people would have seen or heard of the film. Knowledge of a sixty seven year old film staring Ingrid Bergman, without being an old movie buff, industry person or film student would give a average target age group of approximately 60-90 years old! The revenge book is not a mainstream publication, but instead the kind of book that was originally sold in the places that sell anarchist/militia/fight the system type media. Such as Paladin and Loompanics. That tells me that this is not the invention of people in their youth, but it would appeal to people in their youth. No teenager would come up with anything as antiquated as Gaslighting! Antiquated? Hmmmmm...


How Gaslighting relates to Gangstalking is in the use of using stupid and mondain everyday tactics to harass someone. In Gangstalking, people are targeted openly in legal yet immoral ways that are psychological in nature, aside from the illegal ways. Some of them alledged to be covered in the book.


Gaslighting is really a form of serious psychological conditioning. In conditioning the goal is to change behavior by introducing or removing stimuli from the subject's environment. So in the stupid world of made up terminology that is Gang Stalking, Gaslighting fills in for the term generalization by psychological conditioning, where everyday events take on a psychological agenda.


A person is targeted in ways that are meant to attack their sanity and make them doubt themselves. A targeted person might find that they are the subject of a negative gossip campaign or out right lies to their face. So what? Sure this has happened to most people at some point in their lives when they find themselves in the path of a jealous rival or jackass, but being attacked by a jealous rival or jackass is not Gangstalking! Nor is being the object of a bullies harassment necessarily Gangstalking.


Some of the psychological aspects of Gangstalking involve what would seem like routine haters, well just hating, and if that was the case it would be easy to stop, but that isn't the case. It isn't everyday people with grudges. A target might be told that they failed to do something that they were asked to do, or that something that happened around them never happened, and this is done on a repeated basis to the individual and those around the individual. The idea is to make the person doubt themselves and look foolish, delusional or incompetent in the eyes of anyone who matters or is available to watch. This is done to damage credibility.


Now of course It's not new for anyone to be a bitch or a jerk and make things difficult for a person because they don't like them or want what they have, and I think that's what most people think Gangstalking is. However, Gangstalking is not the average everyday office jerk, retched neighbor, or jealous individual acting alone or in a small group to make someone's life a living hell. The cooperation from law enforcement alone is beyond the everyday person, let alone the other things that can occur.


But in order to truly drive someone crazy, undermining their credibility with others is not enough, the target's credibility must be undermined with that individual against themselves as well, which is why psychological conditioning takes place on the broader scale to induce delusion.


A target may always see a certain thing, hear a certain noise, or phrase that in turn is meant to create an association. For example, a victim of Gangstalking tactics might find that certain types of people, events, cars, sounds, or smells are always occurring in their vicinity when in the act of routinely going about their lives without realizing their in the presence of their stalkers. This is done in order to create a psychological association to the object, smell, event, type of person, or sound in the target's mind. The key is that the stimuli that is introduced into the subject's environment must be common, so that after the initial stalking has subsided the target has become sensitized to the stimulus and will continue to be psychologically tormented, because the stimulus is still in their everyday environment, thus creating the generalization.


For more information on conditioning anyone interested can look up John Watson, the father of Behaviorism, and B. F. Skinner. I'm not here to try to teach anyone psychology by going in depth, I'll leave that up to the interested, because nobody wants to read technical stuff, and that is exactly why Ikea has the world's easiest directions for assembly :)


I do want to mention an example of conditioning here though. Now take for example the case of Classical Conditioning and "Little Albert", who was a baby subjected to ridiculous and traumatizing harassment at the hands of psychologist John Watson, in order to prove the point that fear is a learned response. The young baby was introduced to animals that he initially liked, and than the animals were reintroduced with the bang of loud noises in order to create an association between the animals and the startling noise. "Little Albert" was conditioned to expect an adverse reaction from any exposure to the animals that was so ingrained, that he even felt anxiety when a fur coat was given to him, well after the loud banging noise was no longer used to condition him. "Little Albert's" association was based on sensitizing him to the stimulus. "Little Albert" now had a rational but irrational learned response to all things furry (generalization), because he had been frightened so dramatically whenever something furry had been introduced that he expected it to continue.


Allegedly, Little Albert was desensitized to the association between furry animals and the learned anxiety of the expected loud noise. The point of mentioning "Little Albert" here is to show that everyday stimuli can be introduced into a normal healthy person's environment to condition that individual through generalization. That is why targets are so vulnerable to attack. Any person can become a victim of Gangstalking (seriously any person), because the stimuli are present in the everyday environment and presented only to that individual, just as "Little Albert" was the only one affected by the conditioning tailored for him without ever knowing it. That is unless a person is lucky enough to know psychological conditioning when observing it, or being subjected to it


The initial conditioned response is learned by exposure without the subject noticing that it's taking place. The unconscious mind recognizes the correlation between the stimuli and the occurrence, but the conscious mind only recognizes the anxiety or other emotion that is associated with the stimuli, without understanding the direct cause. At least ideally that is how it is suppose to work. A learned response without someone knowing that the learning is taking place or that they have learned to make the association is basically what Gaslighting is. But most people do notice that something is taking place, but the beauty is that only the individual is meant to see it. And since the events take place on a basis regular enough to draw attention to them by the subject, but rare enough to cause attention by others, it makes a person appear to be perceiving events that are not occurring because others miss it. However, the person is not delusional in any way, but overtime the victim is supposed to wonder is it all really happening, and to be driven mad by self doubt, alienation and the ingrained sensitization to stimulus through generalization. Making someone doubt themselves and their sanity is what the goal of the term Gaslighting is all about. Gaslighting is meant to trick the victim into believing a state of Induced delusion. It's the mind game of all mind games. It takes at least 100 people and law enforcement cooperation to pull off a true Gangstalking.


I think it was very stupid and cruel for Dr. Watson to choose a baby, had he really wanted to prove a point he would have got a consenting adult, not an impressionable child. I guess we should all be grateful to the horrific anxiety that was imposed upon "Little Albert" in the name of science, because behaviorism sprang from it. Still we would consider what Watson did in today's world child abuse, psychological harassment and just plain mean. Yet thanks to Noam Chomsky, behaviorism's ideas were scrutinized for neglecting certain aspects of behavior in cognition. If it weren't for the unwitting subject where would most of the advancements in psychology and medicine be? I guess there always has to be a guinea pig, even baby guinea pigs. I'm sure "Little Albert" never had an adverse episode in his life that could be traced to that traumatic time in his infancy (sarcasm). Of course Freud and Piaget might have argue that "Little Albert" had been affected.


Gaslighting is real even if it is based on a silly made up term someone decided to use for the purpose of describing Classical and Operant Conditioning to psychologically harass a person. The tactics used to target people show that the individuals who decided to form Gangstalking are not only very sick but knowledgeable and stupid, and in need of serious mental help. They clearly have certain knowledge that helped create this, and they know somewhat how to use it, and need to be stopped. The use of covert psychological conditioning raises a lot of questions about the individuals behind behind this.


Funny, I came across another old movie once that was suggested on a Gangstalking websites called "Carnival of Souls", which is another very old Black and white film about a woman being followed across the country only to find out it was death that was pursuing her. Hmmm, does the love of using old films as a MO lead to that Hollywood connection I keep mentioning or simply something more personal about the perpetrators? I can only cover one thing at a time and today it is Gaslighting, for the second and last time. I still need to go over all the other fantastic allegations made by the stupid conspiracy sites concerning Gangstalking.


I want to discredit the stupidity of Gangstalking and all it's many forms of propaganda spread out across the Internet as best I can, while I'm around. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, and I have no intentions of becoming one anytime soon. I just want to discredit the hoax's lies so that people can know the truth that the hoax is hiding what is true, so that anyone who participates in this sick crime can be charged for breaking state and federal laws.


On a side note I want to mention that college students are often recruited to participate in Gangstalking and Gaslighting. These students are recruited through different means including adds and word of mouth, and in rare cases by professors. In many cases, the students have no idea what the real reason is behind what they have being asked to do, but that is not always the case. I'll cover that later when I start naming names, as some college professors are notorious for using there students so that they can collect data that can be used professionally by themselves or colleagues.

Human Conditioning: Served With A Side Of Hate

Some believe that what I experienced was a hate crime, and it was in a sense. But, no one shouted racial, gender specific, religious or sexual preference epithets at me, for the most part, and no one ever had to. Hate is a very delicate and personal feeling. Hate has no rule other than that the hater must choose something either real or imagined to despise a group or individual. It's all in the mind of the hater.



Famous haters include, but are not limited to, so many diverse groups of seemingly normal people. Normal in itself is abnormal depending on which side of the looking glass one is on. Yet, people are still amazed by hate crimes. The exaggeration in differences real or perceived are always dangerous to those small in mind. Hating others because of their religious choice, gender, culture, ethnicity, speech, education, color, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, attire, physical appearance, disability or advantage is a favorite of the tiny of mind.



Tiny minded, evolve already! Why do the tiny minded continue to flourish and wreak havoc on the world? It has never been about hating the game over the player, as there would be no game without the players. Hate is the sickest game anyone can play yet everyone on one level or another plays into it, just not everyone is willing to go to the extremes of destroying some one's life or full out genocide. Yet, Evey bit of hate hurts.



I came to the Internet to try and expose a crime that does not discriminate in it's victims. I came to the Internet to expose a bunch of depraved people for their actions. The people who assisted in what happened to me were not all just the jerks next door. These people were cops, FBI agents, college professors, government researchers and military, that hid behind everyday people by using other people to assist them. These people are about doing terrible things to people because they can and must.



I am not the only victim of what is known on the Internet by a few names like "gangstalking", but I was a very special target of the crime. I have personally known other victims of this crime, but none of them had entire websites created about them in the name of "gangstalking". I thought that in coming to the Internet and telling people what happened to me I would be making it easier for other victims to come forward and speak up about what happened to them.



Some refer to gangstalking as being a type of bullying, but it's not really that innocent. Bullying is much safer. Gangstalking victims are rarely harassed by the same individuals, and red flag words are rarely spoken to people who are victims, in the form of harassment. No one will break any laws that are obvious in attacking a victim until no one believes that a crime is taking place. When no one believes the victim is when he/she becomes the most vulnerable.



Victims are often harassed mentally and physically in strange ways that accumulate over time. Some victims have had their homes and cars broken into, but items taken are too petty to involve a serious investigation by law enforcement, because nothing of value is rarely taken and no signs of forced entry exists. The perpetrators often have keys or lock picking equipment. Alarms also don't help, because they aren't regular people. If a victim calls the police to report a break in the police are going to come out, but when they arrive and find out that there are no signs of forced entry and the only items missing are small items that could be misplaced like a document, TV remote and silverware then the cops are going to say the victim is crazy!



Now, the victims didn't lie, and they did exactly what the criminals wanted them to do, which was to make themselves look like an ass. The criminals come back several times to do the same spontaneous debauchery by breaking into the victims home to steal all their staples or finish taking their last silverware, and in doing so, leave the victim to know that they have entered their home and their isn't shit that can be done. If the victim has been worried enough to continue to call the authorities, then their screwed, because now they seem like a paranoid nut who obviously needs help but is doing it for the attention. That's just one psychological game that is played in gangstalking, but their are many more. Once the victim knows that they are not safe in their own home and that the police will not assist the real crimes begin.



I'm sure that people read what I write and say hey this chic is either really creative or really psycho, but everything I write is based on facts and truths, I will tell no lies on this, so help me God.



Their is another technique used in gangstalking that is called "gaslighting", that takes it's name from a 1940's film of the same name. The technique is used to make a victim doubt themselves and believe they are crazy. The techniques of gangstalking are so stupid that they obviously were thought of by very intelligent idiots. Yes, these people are intelligent but they are also morons.



First rule of mental instability/insanity is that crazy people never think they are crazy, just like drug addicts and alcoholics never think they have a problem. If a person begins to think that what they are experiencing is a sign that they are gaining a mental illness, chances are they are not mentally ill. But, in gaslighting the goal is to do just that by "conditioning" a victim to fear and doubt. Victims may be followed by certain cars of certain colors at certain times of the day when a victim is alone the most. If a victim stops being alone and tries to show someone else the cars will stop and change to a different schedule or shade. All of this is childish but it is meant to make the victim wonder because, they have no idea why they are being followed or why anyone is repeatedly following them everywhere they go and the police won't help. And, still there are many many more techniques used that are just as effective for "conditioning" some just as asinine, while others are life threatening. Some victims, including myself, have had attempts on their lives.



I wonder if any of this is actually getting through to people or if all this is a waste of time. This can happen to anyone at anytime because no victim has been believed, or most give up the fight out of shame and ridicule. I'm not a shy person, nor have I ever been, and I don't plan to back down from standing up against people who abuse power to play games that destroy families and lives. People have committed suicide over these psychological and physical attacks, because they can continue for years. It is a perfect crime, if the criminals can remain anonymous. In my case the only anonymous individuals are the ones I haven't named. I know who conspired against me, and they think I'm too scared or embarrassed to tell. Yet, I only get one chance to finger them and my evidence had better be 100%, as their credibility alone could blow me out the waters.



If someone turns in a cop that is crooked without proper evidence, who will believe the allegations? Report a doctor for misconduct without enough evidence and what will be done? Blow the whistle on a crooked politician, but what will it matter without evidence? There is no shortage of crooked people in the world. There is only a shortage of people who are willing to believe that these people are doing wrong in the first place. The deeds of the wicked are always seen and heard, but the reports of such deeds are often overlooked based on status or fear. People are always reporting high crimes, abuses of power and misconduct but who listens when the perpetrator is in a status of power. That is a concept that people, regardless of where they live in the world should understand. For example, look how long it took the world to believe that molestation of young boys in the Catholic Church by Catholic priest was a problem? If it was not for the media, Internet and the access to information today, the Catholic Church would have continued to hide the truth as they had done for centuries.



Information is power, and all I have done here is provide information that is based in fact and truth that was meant to empower others. Anyone who has or will ever take the time to read my wall will be better off for it, because of the information here. My campaign has always been to enlighten people by exposing the truths hidden in the dark. What happened to me takes place all over the world. People abuse power everyday, and many more people suffer for it. In every country across the globe people are denied rights, protections and freedoms at the hands of those who abuse the powers they wield.



I live in a country that is so prized the world round for the democracy, freedom and opportunities given to, not only it's citizens, but to those who set foot on it's land. People come to the United Stated from all over the world for the wonderful gifts of free education, religious freedom, freedom of expression, employment, housing etc. No where else in the world can an individual come into a foreign country with nothing more than the clothes on their back and be faced with such opportunities. Yet, at the same time such freedoms have a price, and the United States has a history of certain behaviors.



I have not read much of the documents from the Wiki Leaks scandal involving U.S. wires, but what I have read seems to be calculated in it's release to the public. The Wiki Leaks I have read involve leaders of non U.S. countries and territories asking the U.S. for backroom deals against nations that these non U.S. leaders oppose, and the U.S. has declined such backroom assistance, but the U.S. has also had a mysterious breach in security that has let hundreds of incriminating cable wires loose into the information arena. Those incriminating cable wires put the truth into light about how smaller nations wish to use the U.S. as "Big Brother" to protect their "ass"ets, but also how these smaller nations want to keep face and not start wars they aren't prepared to fight without "Big Brother".



Now, other nations know the true thoughts of their foes, and now decisions have to be made based on those truths. It was kind of like going to the most popular and influential person in the room and telling them how much you hate someone else in the room, then another person does the same and so on, then when that influential and powerful person spills the beans, everyone is shocked at what the other has said and anger ensues, while the influential and powerful person walks out of the room leaving tensions to build.



The Wiki Leaks were no mistake. If those leaks were not calculated then it was pure Divine intervention, and it was the hand of God exposing the truth. As much as I believe in God, I also believe in power plays, and the Wiki Leaks scandal looks like classic power plays to pit people against one another by an excellent puppeteer. The United States has no qualms in sacrificing anyone for the greater good/goal. I write all this as a citizen of this country who had to see that even today with all the information available that secrets are kept, and that people like me are used for the greater goal. There are not many people inside or outside of this country that would challenge the police or the FBI on their own, as I have. I have committed no crime, yet I can be subjected to high harassment. Thanks you to all those who voted for the Patriot Act (sarcasm). I'm in America where I can take on the authorities at my own risk as a right, not everyone around the world has such a privilege, and I know that, but it still has a price to use.


How many of you could be followed everywhere you went 24 hours a day by teams of people only to go to law enforcement to find out that they are in on it? How many of you could walk into an FBI office only to find out that your reason for coming is known before you give your report, and then you are told no one is going to help you? Who among you would continue to fight for your freedoms when clearly the odds are above you and people in power are opposed to helping you? What would any of you do if someone threatened your life, not in words, but in the act of trying to kill you, yet the authorities look the other way? How many of you could walk in my shoes? Lucky for all of you, most of you will never have to, because I am willing to tell all the truth behind the lies, and how the game is played, all the way down to it's players to help spread some awareness.



I'm the one who has lost and sacrificed a lot just to be here writing this. None of you know me, but you know my works, words, and thoughts by way of others who have found my words, works, and thoughts useful to their endeavors. This crime has happened to others, but not quite like it has happened to me.



My wall states that I am suicidal, but not that I am afraid. I fear nothing and no one. I will kill myself not because I am filled with shame, remorse, fear or sadness, but because I refuse to live a life where others have the power to continue to sacrifice my life for there quest. I will not live my life as a research pet, and I'm sure that if any one of you walked in my shoes you would have similar feelings. But, I also never said if I would be the only one partaking in the departure.



None of you have walked in my shoes, and I know that because of this, it is easy to judge me in my words and my actions. Surely I am the one to be judged here, as I have put my life out in the open to help save others. Maybe I am stupid to care so much for strangers that I am willing to expose my experience in order to bring the deeds done in darkness into the light, so that there are no more victims.



Yes, maybe my desire to help others to avoid what I have gone through is my biggest mistake. Maybe I should never have come to the Internet to spread information about things that are meant to remain unknown to the public. Only could you truly ever know by experience, and believe it or not I love all of you more than that, even though I know many of you are only here to see me die. And, don't worry, you will get your wish soon enough.



I am anonymous because I too represent the thousands of anonymous victims of this psychological and physical crime. I don't want people to get caught up in the trivial (race/religion/etc) and not see the true cause. I will step out of the shadows soon, as I am no coward. I don't want anyone to experience my experience or know the hurt that I do by whatever means it takes.



Before I die, I will, in someway, make this world a better place than it is now. Something significant is going to take place very soon, and I hope you are all around to see it, and I hope you choose the right side.



Those good of heart and mind always hold more power than those who are not. If your heart is with God or at least your actions are pure (if you don't follow God) please do what you can beyond yourself to make this world a place where evil has no place to hide, as we are all here together. There are a lot of voices to be heard, and so many are speaking the same words, saying the differences really are much smaller than all the similarities we share. There is only one human race, and we must all finish it together.