I have covered a lot here about gangstalking and how it applies to what happened to me. Today, I want to explore a correlation between gangstalking and the US Patriot Act.
I have often stated my dislike of the Patriot Act, but I have never really gone into detail as to why I have an issue with it. Today I will say why.
When someone is gangstalked it is said that their name ends up on "lists". Lists that allow things to occur in a person's life that are not ordinary and are meant to destroy a person's life. The tricky part is how people end up on "lists"
True enough, someone could make a lot of false reports to various agencies that in turn would be forced to check on the accuser's lies against innocent people. True enough, any jerk with a big enough grudge and a sick enough mind could call the authorities and make false reports to any number of social/political/law enforcement agencies that could open various investigations. All this being true, what does this mean to gangstalking.
In my case, my place on someone's radar goes all the way to the federal level and that's fact. The FBI was expecting me.
People can balk at this so called cause stalking, gangstalking, community harassment or conspiracy, but the truth is that this truly does happen to people, a lot of whom are innocent, but that innocents is covered with lies.
What happened to me did not happen over night, nor was I a random target. I'm not a felon and I have no criminal record. I have no history of violence or mental illness, and I am not currently or have I ever been mentally ill. So, that should automatically eliminate me from several " list" that might cause a person to be investigated/watched/gangstalked, right? Wrong. Absolutely wrong. A person does not have to ever do a thing wrong in order to be hunted by someone who wants their life.
One way for an innocent person to end up on a " list" is through a completely unrelated investigation, that has been made possible in recent times by the US Patriot Act.
The Patriot Act gave absurd legitimate abuse of power where it did not exist before. The Patriot Act at face claims to protect America and it's citizens from terrorists period. The USA Patriot Act is actually an acronym that stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. http://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/highlights.htm
On it's face, the Patriot Act seems pretty straight forward, but it has several loopholes. The Patriot Act states that its mission is to discover foreign threats and individual foreign targets plotting to compromise the security and safety of America by neutralizing the threats. The Patriot Act is supposed to protect Americans not open a police state where private citizens are monitored. Unfortunately, that was what the Patriot Act allowed as a loophole in a beautiful little document called a National Security Letter, better known as an NSL.
Prior to the US Patriot Act the rules of surveillance on private US citizens could be manipulated to open investigations, but a court procedure was still usually involved. When pre Patriot Act surveillance on a private citizen was needed, without notifying said citizen (post Hoover administration), the approval sometimes went through a special court using the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) established in 1978. http://www.aclu.org/national-security/foreign-intelligence-surveillance-act-fisa
Like the Patriot Act, FISA was centered on foreign threats to the US, with one difference, private citizens were openly included if suspected as a threat to national security. The Patriot Act gave the power to open an investigation against a private US citizen without a court procedure. This new non regulated procedure created an abuse of the document known as an NSL.
The NSL gave power to the FBI to issue letters, and phone calls promising to produce letters at a later time, in an effort to procure information on any targeted individual without a need to notify the individual or a court of the request. The National Security letter was so abused by the FBI after the Patriot Act was established that an investigation into the abuses of NSLs by the FBI was launched by the Justice Department's Inspector General. The Inspector Generals investigation found NSL power was seriously abused by the FBI. http://m.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/01/nsl-abuse/
What does that have to do with gangstalking? Well it will definitely get an innocent person on a " list" and investigated in an instant. FBI agents are not always as big as the badges they carry, if you understand what I'm saying.
Here is one way how a National Security Letter (NSL) works. The FBI gets a tip or other reason to go on a "fishing expedition", which is fine if a specific/right target was established, but the FBI issues an NSL because they don't always know if they have a legitimate target or not. Think of an NSL as a fishing net being dragged through the ocean. If you drag a big enough net through the water you are bound to catch something more than the fish you are after. No legitimacy other than a bare hunch is required to open a "full" investigation into an innocent person's life using an NSL.
The most important part of the NSL is that it provides complete secrecy of the information requested about a group or individuals, because the company or person the letter is given to has to adhere to a "gag order". The NSL "gag order" makes it a federal crime punishable in prison for anyone to ever tell that they have been given an NSL.
If an NSL is served to a company like AT&T, Google, Facebook, Verizon, AOL or MySpace requesting records that's one thing, because most people don't personally interact with the Verizon, Google, MySpace, AT&T, AOL or Facebook teams. However, that doesn't make it legitimate or mean that the company has to provide the information requested, because an NSL is not an order. Most companies will willing comply with an NSL request, because it is information not detrimental to their operations in most cases.
Any company or individual receiving an NSL has the right to challenge the request being made, because it is not an official order issued by a judge, but a letter of request from an agency. If a person or business refuses an NSL request, than the agency making the NSL request would have to obtain a court order. But how many people are going to deny the federal government any requests for information, or question the legitimacy of the request made? My guess is very few.
All NSL requests come with a "gag order" forbidding any individual who receives one from speaking to anyone about the request. The "gag order" may have left many who received NSL requests from federal agencies, like the FBI, with questions about their rights and no one to turn to, because they are required under federal law not to talk about it. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/09/AR2010080906252.html
A person or company receiving an NSL has the right to consult an attorney before carrying out the request, but not the right to talk about the request, unless the "gag order" is lifted by a judge. So what an NSL boils down to is a warrantless search, and a breach of the US Constitution (read 4th amendment).
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) seems to also see the US Patriot Act as a document in need of serious revisions for it's violations against American citizens. http://www.aclu.org/national-security-technology-and-liberty/national-security-letters
Now imagine an NSL being served to a small place like someone's job, doctor's office, or the administration of someone's school, where this person interacts on a personal basis regularly. Now imagine what thoughts and suspicions would transpire at a person's job or school if this happened. Remember that neither the NSL or the agency delivering the request will tell why the information is needed, or nature of the investigation. So, depending on the intelligence of the person receiving the request it will be honored, and the worst case scenario will probably be conjured to mind by the receiver of the request. Imagine what damage a federal agent asking questions about a person would cause if that person was truly innocent.
Everybody knows that if the FBI comes looking for someone it usually isn't just for shits and giggles. And the truth can never be known by the NSL receiver, because they are forbidden by law from inquiring with the person under investigation, or anyone not a legitimate party to the request made for information.
The increase in suspicion alone could account for why gangstalking victims find it difficult to get assistance. If co workers, neighbors landlords and employees at establishments that are frequented by the victim think the victim is a criminal, than that would explain the coldness and withdrawal that gangstalking victims experience from others. Explaining the change in attitude that occurs in the people around gangstalking victims is critical, because it often has no clear reason. Especially if the victim is like me, and keeps up no trouble with anyone.
Now once a full investigation is opened on a person that person's name and information will go on a"list". This now means that any and all information about that person will be compiled. Everything from who that person knows, and where that person goes, what banks they use and how much money is in there accounts, as well as medical records will be compiled. The report will also cover who family and friends are, and if need be spying on them also to get to the suspect.
A full investigation also includes monitoring mail, and all communications. There is no limit on information gathering in a full investigation especially with an NSL.
During an investigation a dossier will be kept up on that person for as long as it takes to close the investigation, even if it turns out to be a false lead based on bogus information. As long as the person being investigated is of interest, there is no time limit depending on the crime in question, and all records are kept indefinitely, even when the wrong person was investigated. The least they could do is destroy dossiers on innocent people, but once of interest always of interest.
So, if a full investigation is launched against an individual or a group by a federal agency that means access will be granted be it by court order or request. In gangstalking many victims report that there homes are entered but nothing is taken. It might be possible that they were let in by a landlord who wanted to cooperate with an investigation, or a skilled citizen informant, which would require moving things, but not taking valuables. There is always a way into a persons home for a federal law enforcement agency, even passed locked doors and alarm systems.
The victim might even unknowingly let in an investigator who is undercover as a repair person for a utility (cable/gas/electric/phone) a sales person, or through the acceptance of a gift service. Once inside the residence, an agent gets the chance to look around without a warrant or tipping off the suspect. Once in a person's home, certain investigative tools can be used or left behind for monitoring. This is not my wild imagination, but a practice that is common to investigations. I've been at the bureau and seen the costumes on agents first hand.
There are several ways a person can end up on a "list" secured with an NSL without being the intended target as well. Let's say you use a public computer (Internet cafe, library, dorm etc) to check your email one day, and on the same day someone else after or before you uses the same computer to visit a website of interest to the FBI (or other federal agency). The website could be considered anti American, and that person made an anonymous post with what was considered to be terrorist views to that particular website. The FBI could in turn issue an NSL to request that the business release all server information that would reveal who was using that computer or using the network. The requested information will not necessarily reveal the anonymous individual who was on the computer just before or after you, but it will reveal that you were there (and possibly everyone else who was there that time of day) and now you would be considered a suspect/person of interest. That's one way to end up on a " list" when you have done absolutely nothing wrong.
Another way might be to have friends and family who live outside of the US, as most people do. The US Patriot Act, along with other US National Security agencies gives the power to monitor any and all communications as long as one of the parties is outside of the US, with or without a secure threat of terrorism. For example, say a US citizen IMs or calls their brother who lives in the middle east on a regular basis. Say the brother in the middle east has a neighbor they talk to who is not part of a terrorist group, but a guy the brother's neighbor works with and talks to regularly is alleged to be a member of an anti American terrorist group. The suspicion is enough to go fishing/monitor everyone involved to see if the co worker talks to the neighbor, and the neighbor talks to the brother, who in turn talks to his brother living in the US about anything terror related. What any of these people actually are talking about is irrelevant, because what they "might" be talking about is relevant. That scenario brings the National Security Agency (NSA) to mind more so than the CIA. http://m.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/03/warrantless-eavesdropping/ Now that's what I would call paranoia, but it's called an investigation in certain circles.
I'm just telling you some ways that an innocent person can end up on a US government " list" that can then in turn lead to 24hour surveillance as described in some accounts of gangstalking (Including mine), where a victim is pursued all day everyday without any logical reason, because they have committed no crime. Private citizens are also used in gangstalking and the use of private citizens in investigations is not new.
As always I encourage all interested to do their own research and not just take my word for it. But as a victim and researcher, I am more than qualified to speak on this than are a lot of people. I am not a "conspiracy theorist", but a first hand witness.
My philosophy stands as "there is always a logical explanation". I have yet to read any conspiracy theory strong enough to prevent me from debunking it. A conspiracy is merely a bunch of facts without a nexus. I sell no conspiracies here because I have the Nexus. I just haven't given it all up yet. I won't until it is advantageous for me to do so.
It's very interesting that many of the first rampant accounts of what is describers as serious stalking by multiple people goes back to about 1996 here in the US.
For me, my stalking was established over a period of years, and hit it's peak for just a few years. I don't get stalked in an obvious fashion by the same or different people anymore. I am still under surveillance from time to time, and the only reason I know this is because someone wants me to know. I have no other means of knowing when I'm being surveilled over my cell phone, in my car or otherwise unless they let me know. I guess this is how it felt to live under Russia's KGB or Hoover's FBI. Bush's America, God bless it with the help it needs.
I often found that the idea was to have me know I was under surveillance to mess with me the way cats do with their prey. Cats love to torture, maim and harass their victims before either killing them or letting them go. Gangstalking is called a game for good reason, as it is all about toying with every aspect of a person's life with no good reason.
It is possible that I was in the wrong place at the wrong time, and that was how my name ended up on a "list" I could have also more simply been the object of someone's profound hatred and mental instability, who in turn had the ability to get me surveilled and investigated.
The bottom line is that out of all the causes that I have explored in finding out how and why I was targeted and assaulted, this is the most plausible. Yet it still makes no sense to me given what I have experienced.
If I ended up on a "list" because of an NSL information request, a FISA order or any legitimate investigation, that investigation would not have taken years to carry out or years to end, because logically it would have been concluded to be based on false information in a relatively short period. Perhaps I'm putting too much belief in logic.
The length and expense of my stalking over several years, as well as the choice to assault me in the process, leads me to believe that something more than just the Patriot Act and an NSL initiated my stalking, and the stalking of others. Yet a full investigation into my life could have all started this way, with information about me gathered with a hand delivered letter by federal agents or a phone call from federal agents making an NSL request ( without ever providing an actual letter) for my personal information.
The FBI is also notorious for it's use of citizen informants in investigations. This practice is also used by the CIA and police. Citizen informants are often recruited from the civilian populous for their easy access to targets. Many of the citizen informants are co workers, neighbors, and anyone else that law enforcement can trick, manipulate, entice or coerce into spying on someone.
As with all investigations there are rules, even with citizen informants, which means that these people are often bound by law not to speak of their involvement unless called to testify in legal proceedings, and this does not often happen, because citizen informants are frequently asked to do illegal business under the careful watch of law enforcement agencies.
Citizen informants are civilians and therefore have absolutely no access to information about the nature of an investigation and the proper way to conduct an investigation, unless it is given to them. No civilian informant will ever be given full if any information about a target and the reason for any investigation their assistance is used in, because to do so would compromise the entire investigation. Remember "Loose lips sink ships".
Citizen informants have a dual role in investigations. The first role is their easy access to the target because they are already at the jobs or in the neighborhoods of the targets. By using people already around the target the level of suspicion raised by the target is minimized, and it is more likely that the target will not alter their behaviors. Also citizen informants are positioned around a target 24hrs a day already, how convenient is that?Gangstalking also uses citizen informants 24hrs a day. Non civilian spies are still planted around a target, but civilian spies lessen the number of unfamiliar people that start showing up around a target. Gangstalking also uses law enforcement to watch targets. I can't speak for every victim, but I do know that the police were around me way too much.
The second role of citizen informants is to do the job of assisting in an investigation on a target that would be illegal for the law enforcement agency to conduct by law. Citizen informants are private citizens which means that they can spy on targets in ways that law enforcement agencies can not lawfully do. Citizen informants help law enforcement agencies to conduct unlawful investigations on targets period. The methods can mean anything from illegal surveillance to break ins as well as entrapment. Remember that gangstalking victims homes are broken into, but no valuables are ever taken.
I've read on gangstalking sites about victims recounting entrapment, but they call it street theater, because they don't know what it really is. The street theater in gangstalking is meant to provoke a mentally unstable reaction of the victim in front of witnesses or law enforcement so that an arrest or police report can be generated, which is a type of entrapment. I did experience this type of entrapment where I was constantly being placed in extraordinary situations by strangers, only to look around and find police were right there watching and or taking notes. Coincidence?
Citizen informants are not trained investigators but instead individuals who have been given a federal license to be nosy. Law enforcement and federal agencies love the gullible nature of most citizen informants and they take advantage of them every step of the way. Now how many people would be comfortable knowing that someone at their job or in their neighborhood, who had absolutely no training, no real guidelines and no direct supervision, was being asked to say or do things around them, and make serious reports on their activities to police or federal agencies? My guess is not too many people would find that comforting. I'm sure your co workers and neighbors are great, but how great would they be towards you if they thought you committed a crime, and law enforcement flashed badges while asking them to spy on you?
Just because a citizen informant is told not to talk doesn't mean that they will keep quiet, or that they will not be introduced to others citizen informants who are spying on a target. Oh yes, and citizen informants are paid money (unless other arrangements are made) for their services. You didn't think they do it for free did you? Gangstalking uses private citizens to follow targets too. Coincidence? Maybe?
My low profile lifestyle made it very easy for me early on to notice that I was being followed when I was. I don't suppose that that is the case for every victim.
In most parts of the US, If you say your neighbor is selling drugs or molesting children as an anonymous tip that tip has to be investigated, but by who and for how long? Most law enforcement agencies don't have the time or resources to chase false accusations for very long. It would seem that a routine investigation would reveal innocence of the individual, unless gross misconduct was to blame.
It is true that agencies vary from state to state. Investigative agencies exist at the local, state and federal levels, all of which can have overlapping information. In my case, that is exactly what happened.
Police would not take reports on legitimate crimes I tried to report just prior to my assault, and because of the lie given to police I had trouble getting a report after my assault. Federal agents let me know that they were a part of my problem, by letting me know they knew and had no intentions of helping me. My stalking and assault some how does not gel as the product of the US Patriot Act alone or an NSL, but something much more powerful, ignorant and sinister. I made previous mention of the profits being made at my expense, as well as a corporate and Hollywood connections to what happened to me in correlation to being stalked.
The amount of smear that was started against me is usually reserved for "influential people" and/or those who appose "influential people". What I experienced usually happens to politicians, celebrities, people in lawsuits with major corporations, or those who hold trade secrets. To my knowledge none of the aforementioned apply to me.
Yet, suspicions created by the actions of law enforcement requesting information and using civilian spies would undoubtedly start negative propaganda against a target. Any number of conclusions could be drawn by someone being questioned by law enforcement about a target. If the individual being questioned wants to believe the worst about a target they will. It is said that gangstalking victims are often painted by their stalkers as drug dealers, sex offenders, child molesters/abusers, addicts, mentally ill, prostitutes, murders (and the like) within their communities, even when the target has committed no such crimes.
Money was a bigger motivator to my stalkers than anything, and it was the money and business deals that have left me the biggest trails. It is a fact I was investigated, but by whom initially is important, because it did not have to be law enforcement even though it ended with them.
Why would anyone pay a private investigator to follow a person who has no political or high profile ties? Maybe because that person knew information. Information was important to the bottom line. Yet somewhere along the way I pissed off my stalkers royally to the point of them wanting my life, reputation, career and relationships destroyed. They even went the extra step by trying to run me off the road several times and finally assaulting me.
Although I am outspoken, I don't get up on a platform and preach my beliefs and ideas to the world (until now anyway), but that did not stop me from making someone very uncomfortable. I'm not exactly certain what I did or said that made me a threat (I feel I'm pretty harmless), but I do know that the fear of threat grew as I was spied on.
Okay, I do have a general idea as to what I said and did, but it was all harmless really. Someone wanted something from me enough to follow me and spy on me 24hrs a day for several years and somewhere in there I gave them the reason they were looking for. It's said that if you look at anything long enough or hard enough you will find the flaw and if not make one up. If someone was being paid to find something then that is what they are going to do, be it real or created.
Negative propaganda against a target is very much a part of gangstalking activities.
The negative campaign against me made it to my local police department long before I tried to report any crimes, so that no one would believe I had told the truth. Had the police not of been so stupid I may have never been assaulted in the first place. When a woman goes to the police and says she is being followed and would like to file a report, but the police refuse to take a report, the situation screams police cooperation. Every officer I spoke to was more concerned with rather or not I had a boyfriend than if a crime had occurred. I got the impression that the stupid officers I encountered thought I was talking to them because I was attracted to cops and that was the reason, in their minds, why I was at the station so much. I don't think it actually crossed any officer's mind that I was there because I seriously needed police services. Chauvinism and ignorance at its finest.
I have one more body of evidence to lay on the table and autopsy that concerns the why and how this crime chooses victims, but that will have to wait until another time.
I haven't forgot what I have started here when I'm not posting. I don't think anyone really has an idea of what I'm dealing with in my life right now. I'm not here all the time anymore because i'm simply trying to end the reasons that brought me here in the first place. This aside from ending my life.
All I've written since I came here is true. I paid a heavy price for the experience of knowing this information, and I'm not sure what price I will pay for sharing the rest of what I have with others. Truly, that price doesn't matter to me anymore, because I have lost so much already. I still have to give the names of my perpetrators, so that they may be held accountable for what they have done. I'm not their first or only victim, but I think I am the only one of the victims who is strong enough to make them be held accountable for their crimes. My dots have had three years to be connected up. These people will be forced to own up to their deeds, and I'll put my life on the line to do it.
So for the record that is my chief problem with the US Patriot Act. And although there appears to be a lot of strong similarities between an investigation into a person by law enforcement and ganstalking victim's accounts (me included) I will not officially rest my beliefs here.
The correlation between gangstalking and a full investigation by the police or FBI or other agency should not be conclusively drawn at this time, because of the connections to several major corporations. The amount of misconduct, willful neglect and misappropriation of public resources it would take for law enforcement to be the chief players in the crime is staggering, and although available, it does not account for private profits within several major corporations, or does it?
Enough money can mimic a federal investigation if someone has infinite amounts to spend on a private investigation. Why would anyone be willing to spend tens of thousands of dollars to investigate private citizens?
That is a question to be answered another time, as it is the main part of the nexus.
No deed goes unseen by God. What was done in the dark is steadfast coming to the light. Facts don't tell lies.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Monday, January 17, 2011
Human Conditioning: Served With A Side Of Hate
Some believe that what I experienced was a hate crime, and it was in a sense. But, no one shouted racial, gender specific, religious or sexual preference epithets at me, for the most part, and no one ever had to. Hate is a very delicate and personal feeling. Hate has no rule other than that the hater must choose something either real or imagined to despise a group or individual. It's all in the mind of the hater.
Famous haters include, but are not limited to, so many diverse groups of seemingly normal people. Normal in itself is abnormal depending on which side of the looking glass one is on. Yet, people are still amazed by hate crimes. The exaggeration in differences real or perceived are always dangerous to those small in mind. Hating others because of their religious choice, gender, culture, ethnicity, speech, education, color, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, attire, physical appearance, disability or advantage is a favorite of the tiny of mind.
Tiny minded, evolve already! Why do the tiny minded continue to flourish and wreak havoc on the world? It has never been about hating the game over the player, as there would be no game without the players. Hate is the sickest game anyone can play yet everyone on one level or another plays into it, just not everyone is willing to go to the extremes of destroying some one's life or full out genocide. Yet, Evey bit of hate hurts.
I came to the Internet to try and expose a crime that does not discriminate in it's victims. I came to the Internet to expose a bunch of depraved people for their actions. The people who assisted in what happened to me were not all just the jerks next door. These people were cops, FBI agents, college professors, government researchers and military, that hid behind everyday people by using other people to assist them. These people are about doing terrible things to people because they can and must.
I am not the only victim of what is known on the Internet by a few names like "gangstalking", but I was a very special target of the crime. I have personally known other victims of this crime, but none of them had entire websites created about them in the name of "gangstalking". I thought that in coming to the Internet and telling people what happened to me I would be making it easier for other victims to come forward and speak up about what happened to them.
Some refer to gangstalking as being a type of bullying, but it's not really that innocent. Bullying is much safer. Gangstalking victims are rarely harassed by the same individuals, and red flag words are rarely spoken to people who are victims, in the form of harassment. No one will break any laws that are obvious in attacking a victim until no one believes that a crime is taking place. When no one believes the victim is when he/she becomes the most vulnerable.
Victims are often harassed mentally and physically in strange ways that accumulate over time. Some victims have had their homes and cars broken into, but items taken are too petty to involve a serious investigation by law enforcement, because nothing of value is rarely taken and no signs of forced entry exists. The perpetrators often have keys or lock picking equipment. Alarms also don't help, because they aren't regular people. If a victim calls the police to report a break in the police are going to come out, but when they arrive and find out that there are no signs of forced entry and the only items missing are small items that could be misplaced like a document, TV remote and silverware then the cops are going to say the victim is crazy!
Now, the victims didn't lie, and they did exactly what the criminals wanted them to do, which was to make themselves look like an ass. The criminals come back several times to do the same spontaneous debauchery by breaking into the victims home to steal all their staples or finish taking their last silverware, and in doing so, leave the victim to know that they have entered their home and their isn't shit that can be done. If the victim has been worried enough to continue to call the authorities, then their screwed, because now they seem like a paranoid nut who obviously needs help but is doing it for the attention. That's just one psychological game that is played in gangstalking, but their are many more. Once the victim knows that they are not safe in their own home and that the police will not assist the real crimes begin.
I'm sure that people read what I write and say hey this chic is either really creative or really psycho, but everything I write is based on facts and truths, I will tell no lies on this, so help me God.
Their is another technique used in gangstalking that is called "gaslighting", that takes it's name from a 1940's film of the same name. The technique is used to make a victim doubt themselves and believe they are crazy. The techniques of gangstalking are so stupid that they obviously were thought of by very intelligent idiots. Yes, these people are intelligent but they are also morons.
First rule of mental instability/insanity is that crazy people never think they are crazy, just like drug addicts and alcoholics never think they have a problem. If a person begins to think that what they are experiencing is a sign that they are gaining a mental illness, chances are they are not mentally ill. But, in gaslighting the goal is to do just that by "conditioning" a victim to fear and doubt. Victims may be followed by certain cars of certain colors at certain times of the day when a victim is alone the most. If a victim stops being alone and tries to show someone else the cars will stop and change to a different schedule or shade. All of this is childish but it is meant to make the victim wonder because, they have no idea why they are being followed or why anyone is repeatedly following them everywhere they go and the police won't help. And, still there are many many more techniques used that are just as effective for "conditioning" some just as asinine, while others are life threatening. Some victims, including myself, have had attempts on their lives.
I wonder if any of this is actually getting through to people or if all this is a waste of time. This can happen to anyone at anytime because no victim has been believed, or most give up the fight out of shame and ridicule. I'm not a shy person, nor have I ever been, and I don't plan to back down from standing up against people who abuse power to play games that destroy families and lives. People have committed suicide over these psychological and physical attacks, because they can continue for years. It is a perfect crime, if the criminals can remain anonymous. In my case the only anonymous individuals are the ones I haven't named. I know who conspired against me, and they think I'm too scared or embarrassed to tell. Yet, I only get one chance to finger them and my evidence had better be 100%, as their credibility alone could blow me out the waters.
If someone turns in a cop that is crooked without proper evidence, who will believe the allegations? Report a doctor for misconduct without enough evidence and what will be done? Blow the whistle on a crooked politician, but what will it matter without evidence? There is no shortage of crooked people in the world. There is only a shortage of people who are willing to believe that these people are doing wrong in the first place. The deeds of the wicked are always seen and heard, but the reports of such deeds are often overlooked based on status or fear. People are always reporting high crimes, abuses of power and misconduct but who listens when the perpetrator is in a status of power. That is a concept that people, regardless of where they live in the world should understand. For example, look how long it took the world to believe that molestation of young boys in the Catholic Church by Catholic priest was a problem? If it was not for the media, Internet and the access to information today, the Catholic Church would have continued to hide the truth as they had done for centuries.
Information is power, and all I have done here is provide information that is based in fact and truth that was meant to empower others. Anyone who has or will ever take the time to read my wall will be better off for it, because of the information here. My campaign has always been to enlighten people by exposing the truths hidden in the dark. What happened to me takes place all over the world. People abuse power everyday, and many more people suffer for it. In every country across the globe people are denied rights, protections and freedoms at the hands of those who abuse the powers they wield.
I live in a country that is so prized the world round for the democracy, freedom and opportunities given to, not only it's citizens, but to those who set foot on it's land. People come to the United Stated from all over the world for the wonderful gifts of free education, religious freedom, freedom of expression, employment, housing etc. No where else in the world can an individual come into a foreign country with nothing more than the clothes on their back and be faced with such opportunities. Yet, at the same time such freedoms have a price, and the United States has a history of certain behaviors.
I have not read much of the documents from the Wiki Leaks scandal involving U.S. wires, but what I have read seems to be calculated in it's release to the public. The Wiki Leaks I have read involve leaders of non U.S. countries and territories asking the U.S. for backroom deals against nations that these non U.S. leaders oppose, and the U.S. has declined such backroom assistance, but the U.S. has also had a mysterious breach in security that has let hundreds of incriminating cable wires loose into the information arena. Those incriminating cable wires put the truth into light about how smaller nations wish to use the U.S. as "Big Brother" to protect their "ass"ets, but also how these smaller nations want to keep face and not start wars they aren't prepared to fight without "Big Brother".
Now, other nations know the true thoughts of their foes, and now decisions have to be made based on those truths. It was kind of like going to the most popular and influential person in the room and telling them how much you hate someone else in the room, then another person does the same and so on, then when that influential and powerful person spills the beans, everyone is shocked at what the other has said and anger ensues, while the influential and powerful person walks out of the room leaving tensions to build.
The Wiki Leaks were no mistake. If those leaks were not calculated then it was pure Divine intervention, and it was the hand of God exposing the truth. As much as I believe in God, I also believe in power plays, and the Wiki Leaks scandal looks like classic power plays to pit people against one another by an excellent puppeteer. The United States has no qualms in sacrificing anyone for the greater good/goal. I write all this as a citizen of this country who had to see that even today with all the information available that secrets are kept, and that people like me are used for the greater goal. There are not many people inside or outside of this country that would challenge the police or the FBI on their own, as I have. I have committed no crime, yet I can be subjected to high harassment. Thanks you to all those who voted for the Patriot Act (sarcasm). I'm in America where I can take on the authorities at my own risk as a right, not everyone around the world has such a privilege, and I know that, but it still has a price to use.
How many of you could be followed everywhere you went 24 hours a day by teams of people only to go to law enforcement to find out that they are in on it? How many of you could walk into an FBI office only to find out that your reason for coming is known before you give your report, and then you are told no one is going to help you? Who among you would continue to fight for your freedoms when clearly the odds are above you and people in power are opposed to helping you? What would any of you do if someone threatened your life, not in words, but in the act of trying to kill you, yet the authorities look the other way? How many of you could walk in my shoes? Lucky for all of you, most of you will never have to, because I am willing to tell all the truth behind the lies, and how the game is played, all the way down to it's players to help spread some awareness.
I'm the one who has lost and sacrificed a lot just to be here writing this. None of you know me, but you know my works, words, and thoughts by way of others who have found my words, works, and thoughts useful to their endeavors. This crime has happened to others, but not quite like it has happened to me.
My wall states that I am suicidal, but not that I am afraid. I fear nothing and no one. I will kill myself not because I am filled with shame, remorse, fear or sadness, but because I refuse to live a life where others have the power to continue to sacrifice my life for there quest. I will not live my life as a research pet, and I'm sure that if any one of you walked in my shoes you would have similar feelings. But, I also never said if I would be the only one partaking in the departure.
None of you have walked in my shoes, and I know that because of this, it is easy to judge me in my words and my actions. Surely I am the one to be judged here, as I have put my life out in the open to help save others. Maybe I am stupid to care so much for strangers that I am willing to expose my experience in order to bring the deeds done in darkness into the light, so that there are no more victims.
Yes, maybe my desire to help others to avoid what I have gone through is my biggest mistake. Maybe I should never have come to the Internet to spread information about things that are meant to remain unknown to the public. Only could you truly ever know by experience, and believe it or not I love all of you more than that, even though I know many of you are only here to see me die. And, don't worry, you will get your wish soon enough.
I am anonymous because I too represent the thousands of anonymous victims of this psychological and physical crime. I don't want people to get caught up in the trivial (race/religion/etc) and not see the true cause. I will step out of the shadows soon, as I am no coward. I don't want anyone to experience my experience or know the hurt that I do by whatever means it takes.
Before I die, I will, in someway, make this world a better place than it is now. Something significant is going to take place very soon, and I hope you are all around to see it, and I hope you choose the right side.
Those good of heart and mind always hold more power than those who are not. If your heart is with God or at least your actions are pure (if you don't follow God) please do what you can beyond yourself to make this world a place where evil has no place to hide, as we are all here together. There are a lot of voices to be heard, and so many are speaking the same words, saying the differences really are much smaller than all the similarities we share. There is only one human race, and we must all finish it together.
Famous haters include, but are not limited to, so many diverse groups of seemingly normal people. Normal in itself is abnormal depending on which side of the looking glass one is on. Yet, people are still amazed by hate crimes. The exaggeration in differences real or perceived are always dangerous to those small in mind. Hating others because of their religious choice, gender, culture, ethnicity, speech, education, color, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, attire, physical appearance, disability or advantage is a favorite of the tiny of mind.
Tiny minded, evolve already! Why do the tiny minded continue to flourish and wreak havoc on the world? It has never been about hating the game over the player, as there would be no game without the players. Hate is the sickest game anyone can play yet everyone on one level or another plays into it, just not everyone is willing to go to the extremes of destroying some one's life or full out genocide. Yet, Evey bit of hate hurts.
I came to the Internet to try and expose a crime that does not discriminate in it's victims. I came to the Internet to expose a bunch of depraved people for their actions. The people who assisted in what happened to me were not all just the jerks next door. These people were cops, FBI agents, college professors, government researchers and military, that hid behind everyday people by using other people to assist them. These people are about doing terrible things to people because they can and must.
I am not the only victim of what is known on the Internet by a few names like "gangstalking", but I was a very special target of the crime. I have personally known other victims of this crime, but none of them had entire websites created about them in the name of "gangstalking". I thought that in coming to the Internet and telling people what happened to me I would be making it easier for other victims to come forward and speak up about what happened to them.
Some refer to gangstalking as being a type of bullying, but it's not really that innocent. Bullying is much safer. Gangstalking victims are rarely harassed by the same individuals, and red flag words are rarely spoken to people who are victims, in the form of harassment. No one will break any laws that are obvious in attacking a victim until no one believes that a crime is taking place. When no one believes the victim is when he/she becomes the most vulnerable.
Victims are often harassed mentally and physically in strange ways that accumulate over time. Some victims have had their homes and cars broken into, but items taken are too petty to involve a serious investigation by law enforcement, because nothing of value is rarely taken and no signs of forced entry exists. The perpetrators often have keys or lock picking equipment. Alarms also don't help, because they aren't regular people. If a victim calls the police to report a break in the police are going to come out, but when they arrive and find out that there are no signs of forced entry and the only items missing are small items that could be misplaced like a document, TV remote and silverware then the cops are going to say the victim is crazy!
Now, the victims didn't lie, and they did exactly what the criminals wanted them to do, which was to make themselves look like an ass. The criminals come back several times to do the same spontaneous debauchery by breaking into the victims home to steal all their staples or finish taking their last silverware, and in doing so, leave the victim to know that they have entered their home and their isn't shit that can be done. If the victim has been worried enough to continue to call the authorities, then their screwed, because now they seem like a paranoid nut who obviously needs help but is doing it for the attention. That's just one psychological game that is played in gangstalking, but their are many more. Once the victim knows that they are not safe in their own home and that the police will not assist the real crimes begin.
I'm sure that people read what I write and say hey this chic is either really creative or really psycho, but everything I write is based on facts and truths, I will tell no lies on this, so help me God.
Their is another technique used in gangstalking that is called "gaslighting", that takes it's name from a 1940's film of the same name. The technique is used to make a victim doubt themselves and believe they are crazy. The techniques of gangstalking are so stupid that they obviously were thought of by very intelligent idiots. Yes, these people are intelligent but they are also morons.
First rule of mental instability/insanity is that crazy people never think they are crazy, just like drug addicts and alcoholics never think they have a problem. If a person begins to think that what they are experiencing is a sign that they are gaining a mental illness, chances are they are not mentally ill. But, in gaslighting the goal is to do just that by "conditioning" a victim to fear and doubt. Victims may be followed by certain cars of certain colors at certain times of the day when a victim is alone the most. If a victim stops being alone and tries to show someone else the cars will stop and change to a different schedule or shade. All of this is childish but it is meant to make the victim wonder because, they have no idea why they are being followed or why anyone is repeatedly following them everywhere they go and the police won't help. And, still there are many many more techniques used that are just as effective for "conditioning" some just as asinine, while others are life threatening. Some victims, including myself, have had attempts on their lives.
I wonder if any of this is actually getting through to people or if all this is a waste of time. This can happen to anyone at anytime because no victim has been believed, or most give up the fight out of shame and ridicule. I'm not a shy person, nor have I ever been, and I don't plan to back down from standing up against people who abuse power to play games that destroy families and lives. People have committed suicide over these psychological and physical attacks, because they can continue for years. It is a perfect crime, if the criminals can remain anonymous. In my case the only anonymous individuals are the ones I haven't named. I know who conspired against me, and they think I'm too scared or embarrassed to tell. Yet, I only get one chance to finger them and my evidence had better be 100%, as their credibility alone could blow me out the waters.
If someone turns in a cop that is crooked without proper evidence, who will believe the allegations? Report a doctor for misconduct without enough evidence and what will be done? Blow the whistle on a crooked politician, but what will it matter without evidence? There is no shortage of crooked people in the world. There is only a shortage of people who are willing to believe that these people are doing wrong in the first place. The deeds of the wicked are always seen and heard, but the reports of such deeds are often overlooked based on status or fear. People are always reporting high crimes, abuses of power and misconduct but who listens when the perpetrator is in a status of power. That is a concept that people, regardless of where they live in the world should understand. For example, look how long it took the world to believe that molestation of young boys in the Catholic Church by Catholic priest was a problem? If it was not for the media, Internet and the access to information today, the Catholic Church would have continued to hide the truth as they had done for centuries.
Information is power, and all I have done here is provide information that is based in fact and truth that was meant to empower others. Anyone who has or will ever take the time to read my wall will be better off for it, because of the information here. My campaign has always been to enlighten people by exposing the truths hidden in the dark. What happened to me takes place all over the world. People abuse power everyday, and many more people suffer for it. In every country across the globe people are denied rights, protections and freedoms at the hands of those who abuse the powers they wield.
I live in a country that is so prized the world round for the democracy, freedom and opportunities given to, not only it's citizens, but to those who set foot on it's land. People come to the United Stated from all over the world for the wonderful gifts of free education, religious freedom, freedom of expression, employment, housing etc. No where else in the world can an individual come into a foreign country with nothing more than the clothes on their back and be faced with such opportunities. Yet, at the same time such freedoms have a price, and the United States has a history of certain behaviors.
I have not read much of the documents from the Wiki Leaks scandal involving U.S. wires, but what I have read seems to be calculated in it's release to the public. The Wiki Leaks I have read involve leaders of non U.S. countries and territories asking the U.S. for backroom deals against nations that these non U.S. leaders oppose, and the U.S. has declined such backroom assistance, but the U.S. has also had a mysterious breach in security that has let hundreds of incriminating cable wires loose into the information arena. Those incriminating cable wires put the truth into light about how smaller nations wish to use the U.S. as "Big Brother" to protect their "ass"ets, but also how these smaller nations want to keep face and not start wars they aren't prepared to fight without "Big Brother".
Now, other nations know the true thoughts of their foes, and now decisions have to be made based on those truths. It was kind of like going to the most popular and influential person in the room and telling them how much you hate someone else in the room, then another person does the same and so on, then when that influential and powerful person spills the beans, everyone is shocked at what the other has said and anger ensues, while the influential and powerful person walks out of the room leaving tensions to build.
The Wiki Leaks were no mistake. If those leaks were not calculated then it was pure Divine intervention, and it was the hand of God exposing the truth. As much as I believe in God, I also believe in power plays, and the Wiki Leaks scandal looks like classic power plays to pit people against one another by an excellent puppeteer. The United States has no qualms in sacrificing anyone for the greater good/goal. I write all this as a citizen of this country who had to see that even today with all the information available that secrets are kept, and that people like me are used for the greater goal. There are not many people inside or outside of this country that would challenge the police or the FBI on their own, as I have. I have committed no crime, yet I can be subjected to high harassment. Thanks you to all those who voted for the Patriot Act (sarcasm). I'm in America where I can take on the authorities at my own risk as a right, not everyone around the world has such a privilege, and I know that, but it still has a price to use.
How many of you could be followed everywhere you went 24 hours a day by teams of people only to go to law enforcement to find out that they are in on it? How many of you could walk into an FBI office only to find out that your reason for coming is known before you give your report, and then you are told no one is going to help you? Who among you would continue to fight for your freedoms when clearly the odds are above you and people in power are opposed to helping you? What would any of you do if someone threatened your life, not in words, but in the act of trying to kill you, yet the authorities look the other way? How many of you could walk in my shoes? Lucky for all of you, most of you will never have to, because I am willing to tell all the truth behind the lies, and how the game is played, all the way down to it's players to help spread some awareness.
I'm the one who has lost and sacrificed a lot just to be here writing this. None of you know me, but you know my works, words, and thoughts by way of others who have found my words, works, and thoughts useful to their endeavors. This crime has happened to others, but not quite like it has happened to me.
My wall states that I am suicidal, but not that I am afraid. I fear nothing and no one. I will kill myself not because I am filled with shame, remorse, fear or sadness, but because I refuse to live a life where others have the power to continue to sacrifice my life for there quest. I will not live my life as a research pet, and I'm sure that if any one of you walked in my shoes you would have similar feelings. But, I also never said if I would be the only one partaking in the departure.
None of you have walked in my shoes, and I know that because of this, it is easy to judge me in my words and my actions. Surely I am the one to be judged here, as I have put my life out in the open to help save others. Maybe I am stupid to care so much for strangers that I am willing to expose my experience in order to bring the deeds done in darkness into the light, so that there are no more victims.
Yes, maybe my desire to help others to avoid what I have gone through is my biggest mistake. Maybe I should never have come to the Internet to spread information about things that are meant to remain unknown to the public. Only could you truly ever know by experience, and believe it or not I love all of you more than that, even though I know many of you are only here to see me die. And, don't worry, you will get your wish soon enough.
I am anonymous because I too represent the thousands of anonymous victims of this psychological and physical crime. I don't want people to get caught up in the trivial (race/religion/etc) and not see the true cause. I will step out of the shadows soon, as I am no coward. I don't want anyone to experience my experience or know the hurt that I do by whatever means it takes.
Before I die, I will, in someway, make this world a better place than it is now. Something significant is going to take place very soon, and I hope you are all around to see it, and I hope you choose the right side.
Those good of heart and mind always hold more power than those who are not. If your heart is with God or at least your actions are pure (if you don't follow God) please do what you can beyond yourself to make this world a place where evil has no place to hide, as we are all here together. There are a lot of voices to be heard, and so many are speaking the same words, saying the differences really are much smaller than all the similarities we share. There is only one human race, and we must all finish it together.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
V2K: Hearing Voices?
How plausible is it that someone can send sound to someone else from a distance with an invisible source?
It's very plausible, and it's called radio, television and a cell phone. If sound can be transmitted via different wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum across large areas such as a satellite dish or cell phone tower, and then on to a smaller receiver such as a TV, cell phone or radio, then sending sound directly to a person's head becomes plausible.
It is a fact that sound can be sent on a beam of light of a certain wavelengths. The wavelengths are invisible and all around us, so who could prove they were being targeted with such technology?
Now here's the tricky part, if sound is transmitted to a human's head where is the receiver? All sound is sent on a frequency to a receiver, as in the TV, radio communications and cell phones which operate on certain known frequencies. So, what frequency is the human brain?
Well, it has been known for almost a century that certain frequencies can stimulate the brain, and now we can all buy some type of technology to alter our moods in the form of various novelties and devices meant to relax or stimulate the brain, as the brain uses frequencies.
Again, this makes it plausible that sound could be sent to a human skull or in close enough proximity to a human skull that it could create sounds or voices that only one person could hear, without any implants to receive the wavelengths, creating symptoms of schizophrenia in sane persons, as sane people don't hear voices (unless they're saints or prophets).
These days if someone actually heard the voice of God and told others, they would probably be telling prophecies from a padded cell. So it is possible that all the people gangstalked who claim to be victims of V2K are telling the truth, not a perceived truth but the honest actual truth, because what they describe may be quite more than plausible. But, that doesn't mean that the victims were bombarded with energy fields, as there are lesser technologies that can do the trick that anyone with enough time and money at hand could acquire and utilize to their advantage.
So, once again I won't scream government conspiracy (just yet). But, I will scream regular conspiracy carried out by stupid people to destroy the lives of others for profit and personal gain.
The U.S. Government has acquired several patents for technology, and neuroscience has several newer treatments that would hint at the very idea of V2K, and I will post links to some of those patents and treatments just as an FYI.
Also, now that I have explored the likely chance of V2K as a plausibility via technology, I will have to post on gwen and haarp technology at some point.
So, in conclusion on V2K I ask the question; why would the government want to test such technologies on the unwitting public? The answer would be necessity, and it wouldn't be the first time unwitting subjects were used in research. However, if it is not the government it is known to the government, who isn't doing anything to stop it, and it must be making someone a fortune. Enough money always seems to close eyes.
It is possible that V2K may be a public test of some type of "Non Lethal Weapon" that must be tested blindly in real life situations to yield accurate data.
It is the belief and level of rational of the individual that will determine the source of the voices heard or injuries sustained as either government, aliens, mental illness, ghosts etc., but it doesn't mean that any of the victims are "crazy", "liars", or "delusional". All gangstalking victims have trouble explaining the unexplainable.
I have not experienced V2K to my knowledge, but what I have experienced is not easy to put into words as a victim of gangstalking. I still have yet to know of anyone else who has had an experience that closely or completely mirrors my own.
Even with all the many victims world wide I am still very much alone.
It's very plausible, and it's called radio, television and a cell phone. If sound can be transmitted via different wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum across large areas such as a satellite dish or cell phone tower, and then on to a smaller receiver such as a TV, cell phone or radio, then sending sound directly to a person's head becomes plausible.
It is a fact that sound can be sent on a beam of light of a certain wavelengths. The wavelengths are invisible and all around us, so who could prove they were being targeted with such technology?
Now here's the tricky part, if sound is transmitted to a human's head where is the receiver? All sound is sent on a frequency to a receiver, as in the TV, radio communications and cell phones which operate on certain known frequencies. So, what frequency is the human brain?
Well, it has been known for almost a century that certain frequencies can stimulate the brain, and now we can all buy some type of technology to alter our moods in the form of various novelties and devices meant to relax or stimulate the brain, as the brain uses frequencies.
Again, this makes it plausible that sound could be sent to a human skull or in close enough proximity to a human skull that it could create sounds or voices that only one person could hear, without any implants to receive the wavelengths, creating symptoms of schizophrenia in sane persons, as sane people don't hear voices (unless they're saints or prophets).
These days if someone actually heard the voice of God and told others, they would probably be telling prophecies from a padded cell. So it is possible that all the people gangstalked who claim to be victims of V2K are telling the truth, not a perceived truth but the honest actual truth, because what they describe may be quite more than plausible. But, that doesn't mean that the victims were bombarded with energy fields, as there are lesser technologies that can do the trick that anyone with enough time and money at hand could acquire and utilize to their advantage.
So, once again I won't scream government conspiracy (just yet). But, I will scream regular conspiracy carried out by stupid people to destroy the lives of others for profit and personal gain.
The U.S. Government has acquired several patents for technology, and neuroscience has several newer treatments that would hint at the very idea of V2K, and I will post links to some of those patents and treatments just as an FYI.
Also, now that I have explored the likely chance of V2K as a plausibility via technology, I will have to post on gwen and haarp technology at some point.
So, in conclusion on V2K I ask the question; why would the government want to test such technologies on the unwitting public? The answer would be necessity, and it wouldn't be the first time unwitting subjects were used in research. However, if it is not the government it is known to the government, who isn't doing anything to stop it, and it must be making someone a fortune. Enough money always seems to close eyes.
It is possible that V2K may be a public test of some type of "Non Lethal Weapon" that must be tested blindly in real life situations to yield accurate data.
It is the belief and level of rational of the individual that will determine the source of the voices heard or injuries sustained as either government, aliens, mental illness, ghosts etc., but it doesn't mean that any of the victims are "crazy", "liars", or "delusional". All gangstalking victims have trouble explaining the unexplainable.
I have not experienced V2K to my knowledge, but what I have experienced is not easy to put into words as a victim of gangstalking. I still have yet to know of anyone else who has had an experience that closely or completely mirrors my own.
Even with all the many victims world wide I am still very much alone.
Thursday, September 30, 2010
The Truth Behind Gangstalking
Gangstalking is real, and the lives of innocent people are destroyed for no reason, and the crime is so beautifully executed it leaves little evidence to trace by the average person, making victims dependent on law enforcement who are aware and in on the destruction of the victim.
Gangstalking involves a mix of negative propaganda and law enforcement cooperation. I have known of several innocent people who have been harmed by this practice, but as I said, the crime is beautifully executed and all those involved stick together to cover their own asses.
I believe that gangstalking works in a chain, and destroys lives like a virus. Just the way one catches a cold and does not know how or where they picked up the virus, but they are stuck with it until it runs its course. But, with anything that involves the cooperation of various agencies, especially government agencies, is highly organized and dangerous.
I have a theory that many of today's suicides and the shooters who go on mass murder sprees, and then kill themselves, are probably victims of gangstalking. Many people don't know why these people decide to kill themselves or others at their jobs or schools, but I can bet that it is related to gangstalking, because in gangstalking, the victim is isolated in a very cruel way that ends up taking place in every aspect of the victim's life. Work, school, community, and every place the victim has to go to interact with others.
It is said that the people who act against the victim are not aware that they are causing any harm by their actions, and that the perpetrators are actually innocents themselves, or people who have been coerced into participating against the victim.
Scientologists are known for gangstalking type tactics to silence people, but the perpetrators are other Scientologists, and that does not account for the cooperation of local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies, at least not in my case. I have no positive or negative connection to Scientology.
Masons too are known for gangstalking tactics to silence individuals, and Masons are known for their influence and alliance within the brotherhood of the organization, so it is possible that there could be cooperation from Masons who are in law enforcement, but that still does not explain the level of stalking that took place in my case.
Gangstalking sites have also blamed the government. Obviously the government is aware of the practice of gangstalking or the Federal agents at the FBI offices closet to me would not have participated when I consulted them about crimes against me that fell under federal law, namely cybercrime. It was not like I went to the FBI and blamed aliens or the supernatural. I blamed real people with real crimes that fell under federal laws.
Gangstalking sites have made so many outlandish claims such as mind control by radio waves, biological testing, and induced diseases, and if these claims were not a hoax, as I believe they are, then that definitely takes gangstalking out of the league of ordinary individuals.
The governments of the U.S., Russia, Germany, and Great Britain have been experimenting with mind control and radio waves to alter moods and make people cooperate for decades, and I think I will explore the other wild accusations of gangstalking sites in my next posts just for fun, as I don't believe that any of these tactics are involved in gangstalking.
I'm no conspiracy theorist by a long shot, I'm just an innocent victim of some one's diabolical plot to destroy the lives of individuals without leaving a trace, at least not a trace anyone is willing to investigate.
I believe that the gangstalking sites are filled with lies to make people like me look stupid if they tell people that they have been gangstalked. I found out about gangstalking after I had been stalked and assaulted. I had no prior knowledge of practices and tactics of gangstalking before I myself was stalked. I still believe the sites are a part of an Internet hoax, but in every lie there is a grain of truth, and in this case the grain is that gangstalking is real.
Gangstalking involves a mix of negative propaganda and law enforcement cooperation. I have known of several innocent people who have been harmed by this practice, but as I said, the crime is beautifully executed and all those involved stick together to cover their own asses.
I believe that gangstalking works in a chain, and destroys lives like a virus. Just the way one catches a cold and does not know how or where they picked up the virus, but they are stuck with it until it runs its course. But, with anything that involves the cooperation of various agencies, especially government agencies, is highly organized and dangerous.
I have a theory that many of today's suicides and the shooters who go on mass murder sprees, and then kill themselves, are probably victims of gangstalking. Many people don't know why these people decide to kill themselves or others at their jobs or schools, but I can bet that it is related to gangstalking, because in gangstalking, the victim is isolated in a very cruel way that ends up taking place in every aspect of the victim's life. Work, school, community, and every place the victim has to go to interact with others.
It is said that the people who act against the victim are not aware that they are causing any harm by their actions, and that the perpetrators are actually innocents themselves, or people who have been coerced into participating against the victim.
Scientologists are known for gangstalking type tactics to silence people, but the perpetrators are other Scientologists, and that does not account for the cooperation of local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies, at least not in my case. I have no positive or negative connection to Scientology.
Masons too are known for gangstalking tactics to silence individuals, and Masons are known for their influence and alliance within the brotherhood of the organization, so it is possible that there could be cooperation from Masons who are in law enforcement, but that still does not explain the level of stalking that took place in my case.
Gangstalking sites have also blamed the government. Obviously the government is aware of the practice of gangstalking or the Federal agents at the FBI offices closet to me would not have participated when I consulted them about crimes against me that fell under federal law, namely cybercrime. It was not like I went to the FBI and blamed aliens or the supernatural. I blamed real people with real crimes that fell under federal laws.
Gangstalking sites have made so many outlandish claims such as mind control by radio waves, biological testing, and induced diseases, and if these claims were not a hoax, as I believe they are, then that definitely takes gangstalking out of the league of ordinary individuals.
The governments of the U.S., Russia, Germany, and Great Britain have been experimenting with mind control and radio waves to alter moods and make people cooperate for decades, and I think I will explore the other wild accusations of gangstalking sites in my next posts just for fun, as I don't believe that any of these tactics are involved in gangstalking.
I'm no conspiracy theorist by a long shot, I'm just an innocent victim of some one's diabolical plot to destroy the lives of individuals without leaving a trace, at least not a trace anyone is willing to investigate.
I believe that the gangstalking sites are filled with lies to make people like me look stupid if they tell people that they have been gangstalked. I found out about gangstalking after I had been stalked and assaulted. I had no prior knowledge of practices and tactics of gangstalking before I myself was stalked. I still believe the sites are a part of an Internet hoax, but in every lie there is a grain of truth, and in this case the grain is that gangstalking is real.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Gangstalking: The Law & Police Misconduct
When I first started being followed around by strange men, I tried to report it to the police long before I was assaulted, but the police continued to act as if nothing was wrong. Each time I tried to make a report to police I was treated oddly. I chose to mention Sergeant Opdyke first because he was the first high ranking police officer I reported officer misconduct to after I was assaulted in 2009.
Sergeant Opdyke was the supervisor of officer Vallerga (the officer who met me at the hospital and refused to take a report). When I sat with Sergeant Opdyke he told me he was taking a report, but that ended up not being the case.
Sergeant Opdyke started the interview off with questions about the incident, but then digressed into questions that had nothing to do with the report of the crime, but more like a report on me. Sergeant Opdyke kept glaring down at my chest and asked me what kind of guys I dated, when was the last time I went on a date, and then got agitated with me and claimed I wouldn't talk to him because he was too old. Sergeant Opdyke ended the interview and claimed he would be taking care of the situation. That was a lie.
A few weeks passed and no report was prepared. I returned to my efforts of getting a report. I then spoke with another Sergeant who I won't name because he didn't do anything obviously wrong. The second Sergeant gave me Sergeant Opdyke's cell number. Sergeant Opdyke wouldn't return my calls, so I contacted the second sergeant and explained the situation. The second sergeant told me to hold on the phone while he called seargent Opdyke for me, but the connection was bad, or at least Opdyke pretended to not be able to hear me well, so I said I would call back. I called Opdyke again and he claimed to be in the middle of police business and needed to call me back. Finally, Sergeant Opdyke called me, but the conversation was again not right. During the call Sergeant Opdyke made bizarre accusations too numerous to repeat, but the most notable one was that he was Christ, and I figured that all the ridiculous words were being overheard by other officers. I asked Opdyke if he was alone and he stated yes, which I believe was a lie.
Sergeant Opdyke had the obligation to make sure the report was taken, but he chose to protect the officers who failed to do their jobs. A report was finally generated after a month, two lieutenants, a watch commander, two detectives, some written complaints, and some calls to the Chief's office, but the report was not taken properly, and was never investigated.
I made a formal report against Opdyke and several officers for their conduct, but they remained protected by their badges. No suspects were ever questioned, and no arrests were ever made. That is just a crumb of the police cooperation that takes place in gangstalking.
Interestingly enough, Sergeant Opdyke already knew about me and my family. He metioned things to me as he questioned me that made me think where I heard his name. I thought it can't be the same man, but when i saw the first name on his card and remembered his descripition from my family member i knew it was the same ass.
Tod Opdyke was a jerk even as a young officer in a different city. I remembered that he was tbe jerk officer that used to constanly stop a female relative of mine in the early 1980's, and ask her to have sex with him. When my female relative refused him, Opdyke had all his cop friends gang up on her and harass her with all kinds of nuisance stops and citations for non existent situations. Fortunetley she was not physically assaulted as a result of police agreeing to not do their jobs.
Law enforcement is a part of gangstalking and one of the only reasons it can exist. The websites may be a hoax, but gangstalking is real.
I will be glad to stop naming names and going into detail on each one if just one of my stalkers is willing to step foward and admit they did wrong me. I haven't even given any details yet about my experience as a gangstalking victim or on my perpetrators. I'm still being too nice, don't you think?
Sergeant Opdyke was the supervisor of officer Vallerga (the officer who met me at the hospital and refused to take a report). When I sat with Sergeant Opdyke he told me he was taking a report, but that ended up not being the case.
Sergeant Opdyke started the interview off with questions about the incident, but then digressed into questions that had nothing to do with the report of the crime, but more like a report on me. Sergeant Opdyke kept glaring down at my chest and asked me what kind of guys I dated, when was the last time I went on a date, and then got agitated with me and claimed I wouldn't talk to him because he was too old. Sergeant Opdyke ended the interview and claimed he would be taking care of the situation. That was a lie.
A few weeks passed and no report was prepared. I returned to my efforts of getting a report. I then spoke with another Sergeant who I won't name because he didn't do anything obviously wrong. The second Sergeant gave me Sergeant Opdyke's cell number. Sergeant Opdyke wouldn't return my calls, so I contacted the second sergeant and explained the situation. The second sergeant told me to hold on the phone while he called seargent Opdyke for me, but the connection was bad, or at least Opdyke pretended to not be able to hear me well, so I said I would call back. I called Opdyke again and he claimed to be in the middle of police business and needed to call me back. Finally, Sergeant Opdyke called me, but the conversation was again not right. During the call Sergeant Opdyke made bizarre accusations too numerous to repeat, but the most notable one was that he was Christ, and I figured that all the ridiculous words were being overheard by other officers. I asked Opdyke if he was alone and he stated yes, which I believe was a lie.
Sergeant Opdyke had the obligation to make sure the report was taken, but he chose to protect the officers who failed to do their jobs. A report was finally generated after a month, two lieutenants, a watch commander, two detectives, some written complaints, and some calls to the Chief's office, but the report was not taken properly, and was never investigated.
I made a formal report against Opdyke and several officers for their conduct, but they remained protected by their badges. No suspects were ever questioned, and no arrests were ever made. That is just a crumb of the police cooperation that takes place in gangstalking.
Interestingly enough, Sergeant Opdyke already knew about me and my family. He metioned things to me as he questioned me that made me think where I heard his name. I thought it can't be the same man, but when i saw the first name on his card and remembered his descripition from my family member i knew it was the same ass.
Tod Opdyke was a jerk even as a young officer in a different city. I remembered that he was tbe jerk officer that used to constanly stop a female relative of mine in the early 1980's, and ask her to have sex with him. When my female relative refused him, Opdyke had all his cop friends gang up on her and harass her with all kinds of nuisance stops and citations for non existent situations. Fortunetley she was not physically assaulted as a result of police agreeing to not do their jobs.
Law enforcement is a part of gangstalking and one of the only reasons it can exist. The websites may be a hoax, but gangstalking is real.
I will be glad to stop naming names and going into detail on each one if just one of my stalkers is willing to step foward and admit they did wrong me. I haven't even given any details yet about my experience as a gangstalking victim or on my perpetrators. I'm still being too nice, don't you think?
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Gangstalking: A Gift From The Church Of Scientology?
Gangstalking has been blamed on Scientologist and somehow that theory does not completely gel for me. I have no connection to Scientology. I'm not a Scientologist and I have never been a Scientologist. So what would motivate a Scientologist to systematically attack me in the form of gangstalking?
I have never protested for or against the Church of Scientology or Dianetics in my life. So, how could I have provoked any member of the Church of Scientology to come after me? In my opinion I didn't. In fact most of my stalkers are die hard Christians, Jews, Muslims etc. So, it is possible given the full range of religions practiced by my stalkers that a few Scientologists made it into the mix.
However, the cooperation from law enforcement at the local, state, and federal levels do not support a strong correlation between gangstalking and Scientology. Scientologists do come from all walks of life, and the Church of Scientology does have major headquarters in Southern California located in Hemet and Gillman Hot Spring http://articles.latimes.com/2005/dec/18/business/fi-scientology18. At the Scientology headquarters the group continues to build upon and maintain the power of the church.
Scientology was created by an ex Naval officer and science fiction writer by the name of L Ron Hubbard. Hubbard brought many of his military and creative ideas to the church of Scientology, so it is possible that church members are highly organized and prepared to gangstalk someone. But again, if Scientology was a part of gangstalking what would they expect to gain from ruining the lives of innocent people who have no connection or opposition to the church?
I believe that the church of Scientology is being used as a smoke screen for what is really behind gangstalking, because no one really knows anything about Scientology. Scientology is mysterious and called a cult, and perfect to blame gangstalking on, because so many have no idea what gangstalking or Scientology really is.
Putting the blame on Scientologist for gangstalking is like blaming aliens for abducting people. Alien abduction has been deemed a lie made up by the government to make unwilling participants in human experiments believe that the experiments were done by aliens, but the experiments were being conducted by government researchers. There is much declassified documentation to support theories regarding government researchers conducting fake alien abductions to experiment on the unwilling public.
So, even though Scientologist may be involved in gangstalking, I have not seen enough evidence to support the Church of Scientology as the chief facilitator in gangstalking of innocent people. If I do run across any such evidence that supports the theory that the Church of Scientology is behind gangstalking i will openly support the thorough demise of the entire organization.
I have never protested for or against the Church of Scientology or Dianetics in my life. So, how could I have provoked any member of the Church of Scientology to come after me? In my opinion I didn't. In fact most of my stalkers are die hard Christians, Jews, Muslims etc. So, it is possible given the full range of religions practiced by my stalkers that a few Scientologists made it into the mix.
However, the cooperation from law enforcement at the local, state, and federal levels do not support a strong correlation between gangstalking and Scientology. Scientologists do come from all walks of life, and the Church of Scientology does have major headquarters in Southern California located in Hemet and Gillman Hot Spring http://articles.latimes.com/2005/dec/18/business/fi-scientology18. At the Scientology headquarters the group continues to build upon and maintain the power of the church.
Scientology was created by an ex Naval officer and science fiction writer by the name of L Ron Hubbard. Hubbard brought many of his military and creative ideas to the church of Scientology, so it is possible that church members are highly organized and prepared to gangstalk someone. But again, if Scientology was a part of gangstalking what would they expect to gain from ruining the lives of innocent people who have no connection or opposition to the church?
I believe that the church of Scientology is being used as a smoke screen for what is really behind gangstalking, because no one really knows anything about Scientology. Scientology is mysterious and called a cult, and perfect to blame gangstalking on, because so many have no idea what gangstalking or Scientology really is.
Putting the blame on Scientologist for gangstalking is like blaming aliens for abducting people. Alien abduction has been deemed a lie made up by the government to make unwilling participants in human experiments believe that the experiments were done by aliens, but the experiments were being conducted by government researchers. There is much declassified documentation to support theories regarding government researchers conducting fake alien abductions to experiment on the unwilling public.
So, even though Scientologist may be involved in gangstalking, I have not seen enough evidence to support the Church of Scientology as the chief facilitator in gangstalking of innocent people. If I do run across any such evidence that supports the theory that the Church of Scientology is behind gangstalking i will openly support the thorough demise of the entire organization.
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
What? Scientology? What???
It has been claimed that Scientologist are a group that actively participates in "gangstalking" of innocent people. So I decided to visit the largest church of Scientology in my area. I was curious once again about Scientology, and I fulfilled that curiosity permanently.
What religion would ask a person to pay for spiritual enlightenment? Answer: Scientology. I thought the road to spiritual enlightenment was a free journey that one pays for only with their desire to leave the world behind and become more enlightened. Well, I guess you can put a price on anything $$$$$. However, I respect a person's right to worship in any way that brings them closer to becoming a decent human being.
What I got out of my three hour tour today was...well...not enough to pull me into Scientology, or prove that Scientologist participate in "gangstalking". Why three hours? I was doing research! I do recommend that everyone visit one of these places just for the hell of it for like 5 minutes. It was like going to a free museum of the unexpected. You pop in, you look, you leave, the end. I don't recommend you do more than that. I figure the lobby is set up to fulfill the curious visitors as well as scare them away. The real Scientology stuff is upstairs out of public view.
If someone is looking for a person to go undercover as a Scientologist I'm willing to do it for a lot of money :) I think I could fool them all the way, because their beliefs won't penetrate me. I'm suicidal, I'm not in my right mind, but I still have enough going on in my head to know that Scientology is...not for me.
If you do visit you can expect to be greeted by perky people who will try and sell you books from the many piles/shrines in the lobby. I took lots of pictures while I was inside, and I don't think they noticed or cared, because they never stopped me. The only time I was confronted was when they thought I was going to leave.
I then let them put me in a darkened room to watch a video, and I watched them peek at me through the cracks of the door. I guess they didn't know that I could see them because the room was dark LOL. I also found out that you can't turn down the volume on any of the videos, because the volume is preset. I did find the videos entertaining up to a point. I think the personality tests are kind of fun and funny. I was told that my score was above average and in the top 1%, as if that was going to make me take classes and buy books LOL
They even offered me a class and a book for under $20 with free auditing! I told them I had no money, but I could volunteer hahahahahahahahaha. They still wanted money. No no, Scientology is not for me. I think that Scientologist are like all people who are searching for a better life, and are able to find it through spiritual growth. I'm not entirely convinced that they are pure evil. The people I met were not evil people, but it is always surprising what people will do for a cause. The sweetest people in the world can turn evil if you give them a reason.
It has been claimed that Scientologist are one of the organizations behind "gangstalking", but I have near zero fear factor, so, I went to the Church of Scientology by myself and didn't tell anyone I was going. If they had been the ones stalking me I don't think I would be posting this LOL.
Is Scientology a cult? Maybe, but like I said, I'm willing to go undercover to find out the truth if the price is right $$$$$$$$ :) I will be visiting the Masons next as they are claimed to be in on gangstalking too. Hahahahahahahahaha
What religion would ask a person to pay for spiritual enlightenment? Answer: Scientology. I thought the road to spiritual enlightenment was a free journey that one pays for only with their desire to leave the world behind and become more enlightened. Well, I guess you can put a price on anything $$$$$. However, I respect a person's right to worship in any way that brings them closer to becoming a decent human being.
What I got out of my three hour tour today was...well...not enough to pull me into Scientology, or prove that Scientologist participate in "gangstalking". Why three hours? I was doing research! I do recommend that everyone visit one of these places just for the hell of it for like 5 minutes. It was like going to a free museum of the unexpected. You pop in, you look, you leave, the end. I don't recommend you do more than that. I figure the lobby is set up to fulfill the curious visitors as well as scare them away. The real Scientology stuff is upstairs out of public view.
If someone is looking for a person to go undercover as a Scientologist I'm willing to do it for a lot of money :) I think I could fool them all the way, because their beliefs won't penetrate me. I'm suicidal, I'm not in my right mind, but I still have enough going on in my head to know that Scientology is...not for me.
If you do visit you can expect to be greeted by perky people who will try and sell you books from the many piles/shrines in the lobby. I took lots of pictures while I was inside, and I don't think they noticed or cared, because they never stopped me. The only time I was confronted was when they thought I was going to leave.
I then let them put me in a darkened room to watch a video, and I watched them peek at me through the cracks of the door. I guess they didn't know that I could see them because the room was dark LOL. I also found out that you can't turn down the volume on any of the videos, because the volume is preset. I did find the videos entertaining up to a point. I think the personality tests are kind of fun and funny. I was told that my score was above average and in the top 1%, as if that was going to make me take classes and buy books LOL
They even offered me a class and a book for under $20 with free auditing! I told them I had no money, but I could volunteer hahahahahahahahaha. They still wanted money. No no, Scientology is not for me. I think that Scientologist are like all people who are searching for a better life, and are able to find it through spiritual growth. I'm not entirely convinced that they are pure evil. The people I met were not evil people, but it is always surprising what people will do for a cause. The sweetest people in the world can turn evil if you give them a reason.
It has been claimed that Scientologist are one of the organizations behind "gangstalking", but I have near zero fear factor, so, I went to the Church of Scientology by myself and didn't tell anyone I was going. If they had been the ones stalking me I don't think I would be posting this LOL.
Is Scientology a cult? Maybe, but like I said, I'm willing to go undercover to find out the truth if the price is right $$$$$$$$ :) I will be visiting the Masons next as they are claimed to be in on gangstalking too. Hahahahahahahahaha
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
